Fall 2007 Newsletter
The Anthrax Threat: Transitioning from Theory to Reality in Emergency Responder Practice

Open source intelligence material indicates that violent Islamic fundamentalist groups are making concerted efforts to develop anthrax as a biological weapon of terror. Cognizant of that threat analysis, members of the Hazmat, EMS and biosecurity communities sought and obtained support from Emergent BioSolutions to convene a two day meeting to consider pre-exposure vaccination with Anthrax Vaccine Absorbed (AVA, BioThrax™ ) as an alternative to the current policies of post exposure prophylaxis and treatment.

Accordingly, a group of thought leaders from the emergency responder, law enforcement, public health and biosecurity community, including Professor Bill Stanhope from the Institute, met February 9-11, 2007, to consider the vulnerabilities of the first responder and critical infrastructure workforce should the nation again face a covert terrorist attack with Bacillus anthracis.

At the conclusion of the conference the following consensus statement was developed and unanimously adopted by the participants.

 

Consensus Statement (WORKING DRAFT):

Recognizing the reality of documented attempts of radical terrorist groups to develop and deploy anthrax as a weapon of terror the undersigned are unanimous in their belief that the “civilian” Emergency Responder and Critical Infrastructure workforce should be offered the same level of prospective protection afforded to their federal counterparts.

We urge the Department of Health and Human Services, the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, and the Department of Homeland Security to immediately clear all barriers to the funding, acquisition and delivery of AVA to Emergency Responder/Critical Infrastructure workforce on a voluntary basis.

Moreover, we believe that AVA availability should be prioritized to the Emergency Responder/Critical Infrastructure workforce in the UASI cities and any other communities known or self-assessed to be at high risk for future terrorist attacks.

Recognizing the difficulties encountered during previous smallpox vaccination efforts we further recommend that a reasoned, rational, and realistic education program be developed reflective of the threat and relative risk of another bioterrorist attack using B. Anthracis. That education program should include a careful delineation of the efficacy and safety of AVA, the FDA approved indications, and a discussion of the relative risks and benefits of voluntary receiving the full schedule of AVA vaccine versus a post-exposure strategy that relies on antibiotics alone.

 

Readers wishing to share comments about this consensus statement may email them to Professor Stanhope at stanhowd@slu.edu.

 



Back to Insitute for Biosecurity newsletter
Copyright 2007 Institute for Biosecurity - Saint Louis University School of Public Health